Page 63 - 2025S
P. 63

56                                                                UEC Int’l Mini-Conference No.54







                                  Table 3: Classification Report of DenseNet201 Model

                                  Class Name     Precision  Recall  F1-score  Support

                                     Arjun         1.00      1.00     1.00       84
                                   Holy Basil      1.00      1.00     1.00       84
                                 Green Chiretta    1.00      0.99     0.99       84
                                  Malabar Nut      0.99      1.00     0.99       84
                                    Moringa        1.00      1.00     1.00       84
                                     Neem          1.00      1.00     1.00       84




            better accuracy than other models. However,       eased leaves.
            DenseNet201 obtained 99.00% accuracy on the
            test set, demonstrating its exceptional perfor-   4.2   Model deployment-MPIcam
            mance. While the other four models VGG16 ob-
            tained 93.17%, MobileNetV2 obtained 97.99%,       For model deployment, the best-performing
            ResNet50 obtained 98.59%, and Xception ob-        DenseNet201 model was saved in .h5 format and
            tained 95.58% test accuracy. This comparison      integrated into a Python-based environment us-
            of model performances is shown in Table 3. rep-   ing Streamlit for real-time interaction.  This
            resents about the cnn m odel p erformance.        lightweight web framework enabled the develop-
                                                              ment of a simple and user-friendly interface for
              The automated system integrates correctly       automated plant identification. To evaluate the
            with the DenseNet201 model.       Because of      model’s predictive capability, we used both the
            DenseNet201’s sophisticated CNN design, it        training data and a separate set of new images
            could capture the characteristics of the ther-    for testing. The DenseNet201 model successfully
            apeutic plant precisely.  Precision and recall    identified medicinal plant species, demonstrat-
            scores of 1.00 for most classes in the confu-     ing its robustness and reliability. Fig.3 presents
            sion matrix demonstrated DenseNet201’s reli-      tvaluate the efficacy of the trained DenseNet201
            able performance. However, the implemented        model for automated medicinal plant. identifi-
            automated application could help the common       cation based on leaf Fig.4 illustrates the flow of
            people and the healthcare system to identify      the classification process within the application.
            accurate Bangladeshi medicinal plants easily.     Fig.5 shows about the user interface: Input im-
            Users can take an instant photo and identify      age selection step. Fig.6 displays User interface:
            the plant name along with its facility by us-     Classification result visualization. Fig.7 shows
            ing the MPIcam application. Additionally, users   about the user interface: real time testing visu-
            can upload photos from their device gallery to    alization. Fig.8 presents about the user inter-
            identify medicinal plants.  The system deter-     face: real time testing result.
            mines the relevant plant species by extracting
            leaf features and classifying them using pre-
            trained models. After post-processing, the out-   5    Conclusion
            put is displayed on the screen, and the applica-
            tion automatically makes a decision. As a result,  This study developed an automated applica-
            users can accurately identify medicinal plants    tion that can quickly and accurately identify
            through leaf feature extraction and obtain re-    Bangladeshi medicinal plants without human
            liable results with ease, allowing them to utilize  effort. We evaluated five deep learning mod-
            the plants according to their needs. Future re-   els, including VGG16, ResNet50, Xception, Mo-
            search can explore larger datasets and alterna-   bileNetV2, and DenseNet201, using a primary
            tive models to improve the identification process  dataset. From the models tested, DenseNet201
            as well as distinguish between normal and dis-    performed the best with a 99.00% accuracy.
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68