Page 53 - 2024S
P. 53

46                                                                UEC Int’l Mini-Conference No.52









                     Evaluating Radiation Data Discrepancies in Fukushima: A

                     Comparative Study of Official and Safecast Measeurements

                                              Post-decontamination


                           Imam Ghazali YASMINT , Kayoko YAMAMOTO, Yo ISHIGAKI
                                                      ∗
                                   Joint Doctoral Program for Sustainability Research
                                       The University of Electro-Communications
                                                      Tokyo, Japan


             Keywords: ArcGIS, Fukushima Accident, Post-decontamination, Radiation Monitoring, Safecast.



                                                        Abstract
                    The Fukushima nuclear accident in 2011 resulted in widespread contamination of multiple areas
                 with elevated levels of radioactivity. The Japanese government has made numerous initiatives to de-
                 contaminate these areas until they were considered completely decontaminated in 2018, except for the
                 Difficult-to-return zone. Although decontamination efforts have been completed in nearly all areas, it
                 remains crucial to maintain radiation monitoring to assure the safety and security of returning residents.
                 The Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) and the Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) are govern-
                 ment agencies responsible for official monitoring. At the same time, non-profit organizations such as
                 Safecast facilitate public participation. This study involved comparing official measurement data with
                 Safecast data after the decontamination process. The comparative analysis was conducted utilizing the
                 ArcGIS software. Assessing community data is crucial for verifying accuracy, enhancing methods, and
                 informing the public about radiation safety. The comparison shows discrepancies and offers valuable
                 insights to improve future radiation monitoring.































               ∗
                The author is supported by (SESS) MEXT Scholarship.
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58