Page 45 - 2025S
P. 45

38                                                                UEC Int’l Mini-Conference No.54














                                                                            (a) 0% deformation






                 (a) Topology at highest natural frequency
                                                                            (b) 25% deformation







                                                                            (c) 50% deformation




                      (b) Best compromise topology
                                                                           (d) 100% deformation
                    Figure 7: Obtained topologies
                                                              Figure 8: Amplified deformation contours of
                                                              the optimized structure at four incremental load
            6    Discussion
                                                              levels (0%, 25%, 50%, and 100%). Displace-
                                                              ments are scaled for visibility (scaling factor ap-
            Discussion here. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,      plied), illustrating stiffness retention and contin-
            consectetuer adipiscing elit. Etiam lobortis fa-  uous connectivity as the load increases.
            cilisis sem. Nullam nec mi et neque pharetra
            sollicitudin. Praesent imperdiet mi nec ante.
            Donec ullamcorper, felis non sodales commodo,
                                                              tion, and topology-filtering routines on high-
            lectus velit ultrices augue, a dignissim nibh lec-
                                                              resolution tetrahedral meshes. By penalizing in-
            tus placerat pede. Vivamus nunc nunc, molestie
            ut, ultricies vel, semper in, velit. Ut porttitor.  termediate densities with p = 3, we achieved
            Praesent in sapien. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,   a reduction in strain energy from 8.6876 J to
            consectetuer adipiscing elit. Duis fringilla tris-  0.9442 J—corresponding to a 920% stiffness
            tique neque. Sed interdum libero ut metus. Pel-   gain—without manual tuning. The resulting 2D
                                                              Pareto front spans masses from 0.166 to 0.174 kg
            lentesque placerat. Nam rutrum augue a leo.
            Morbi sed elit sit amet ante lobortis sollicitudin.  at near-zero strain energy, confirming the ef-
            Praesent blandit blandit mauris. Praesent lec-    fective exploration of lightweight yet stiff de-
            tus tellus, aliquet aliquam, luctus a, egestas a,  signs. Introducing the fundamental frequency as
            turpis. Mauris lacinia lorem sit amet ipsum.      a third objective produced a modest 2% mass in-
                                                              crease for an approximate 600 Hz gain, showcas-
            Nunc quis urna dictum turpis accumsan semper.
                                                              ing NSGA-II’s capability to balance static and
                                                              dynamic performance simultaneously.
            7    Conclusions                                    Our automated workflow—built around SBX
                                                              crossover, polynomial mutation, and post-
            This work has demonstrated an end-to-end          processing filters for connectivity and minimum
            framework that integrates the SIMP interpo-       feature size—ensures that optimized topologies
            lation scheme, NSGA-II multi-objective evolu-     are directly compatible with additive manufac-
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50